Solutions · Finance

Financial integrity that
includes everyone

Collaborative fraud and AML/CFT detection: institutions train together, data never moves, and false positives stop deciding who belongs.

The application area: when detection drowns in false positives


Every regulated financial institution must run automated fraud and AML/CFT detection, and everywhere in the world, those systems fail in the same way. The models are trained on narrow, historic data; the alerts they generate are overwhelmingly false; and the burden lands on compliance teams and ordinary customers alike.

This is the application area: detection is mandatory, collaboration is impossible, and the gap is filled with false positives. Federated learning resolves it, institutions train a shared model while customer data never moves.

The application: KYComm


KYComm, Know Your Community, is Goose FL's application of the finance use case to AML/CFT fraud detection and false-positive reduction. A shared detection model is sent to every participating institution. Each trains it behind its own walls, on its own transactions and fraud labels. Only encrypted, privacy-protected mathematical updates return; they are combined on sovereign ground, and the improved model flows back, personalized to each institution's customer base.

  • Detection that reads local reality. Personalized models (pFedMe) learn the informal-sector patterns imported models misread, the market trader cycling cash to restock her stall is commerce, not crime. False positives are cut where they start.
  • Privacy that holds at every layer. Differential privacy under a formal, regulator-visible budget (ε ≤ 8.0 cumulative, materially stronger than deployed practice such as Apple's ε = 4 or the US Census' 15.34); secure aggregation so no update can be traced to any customer; no central vault of anyone's data.
  • Oversight without raw data. A real-time supervisory (SupTech) dashboard gives regulators model performance, privacy-budget consumption and alert quality, never a customer record. Every training round is logged to a tamper-evident audit trail.
  • Data rights by design. Erasure requests are executed inside the trained model, certified unlearning or retraining, with a completion certificate per request.
  • Strengthens, never replaces. The institution's compliance team reviews every alert; CDD, sanctions screening and STR filings to the Nigeria Financial Intelligence Unit remain fully with the institution.

See the trust stack underneath →

The evidence, by the numbers


The platform was validated using authentic transaction datasets. Benchmark testing on the ULB European credit card fraud dataset demonstrated its performance across 284,807 real-world transactions.

0.76 F1 federated, matches the centralized pooled baseline (0.76), zero data shared
+1.4 pts F1 gained vs each bank training alone (0.76 vs 0.74)
6.3 False positives per 10,000 transactions (validation-grade)
≥70% False-positive reduction, pilot target vs legacy systems
ε ≤ 8.0 Cumulative differential-privacy budget over the pilot window

Federated machinery validated on the ULB benchmark (284,807 real transactions) and the IEEE-CIS dataset with three simulated banks and non-IID partitions. Full methodology, results tables and the synthetic-Nigeria validation pipeline are in the technical white paper below.

What this means for institutions


Banks and financial institutions gain automated detection that meets the mandate, with fewer false positives, defensible audit trails, and the biggest lift where local data is thinnest. KYComm is built to support compliance with the CBN Baseline Standards for Automated AML Solutions, including its requirements for model governance and the explainability of automated detection decisions, with coverage extending across further controls in the standards. Regulators and the Nigeria Financial Intelligence Unit gain real-time sector visibility without raw-data access, and higher-quality STRs upstream instead of more noise. Customers keep their access to the formal economy.

Watch: the Compliance Paradox, on film


Our session with the Center for Financial Inclusion, recorded in Abuja with regulators, policymakers and federated-learning researchers, examines the Compliance Paradox and the KYComm response.

Runtime 49 min · published by the Center for Financial Inclusion Financial Inclusion Week 2026

The technical white paper


The Compliance Paradox: How Federated Learning Resolves the AML/CFT Deadlock

Thank you, the white paper is open in a new window.

Built with partners


Shared compliance infrastructure is built with institutions, not sold to them. The Nigerian deployment is carried by four partners:

Sovereign infrastructure host

NITDA

The National Information Technology Development Agency hosts the coordination layer on sovereign ground, under Nigerian jurisdiction, the MOU partner behind the Nigerian deployment.

Visit website →
AI Governance

Responsible AI Governance Institute (RAIGI)

Independent bias and privacy auditing of the model and its outputs, so fairness is verified by eyes outside the project, not asserted by its builders.

Visit website →
Gender & financial inclusion

She's Included

Governance partner ensuring the infrastructure serves women's financial inclusion as a design outcome, from model fairness testing to inclusive deployment.

Visit website →
Regulatory convening

Presidential Committee on Economic and Financial Inclusion (PreCEFI)

Convenor of regulatory engagement, aligning the project with Nigeria's policy priorities and the institutions that supervise it.

Visit website →

Learn more


Building detection that includes your customers?

Whether you're a bank, a fintech or a regulator, we co-design and build this with institutions.

Talk to Goose FL